The tasks of an administrator must be done with an eye to following the intent of the will and the law.
The surviving spouse of an Oklahoman decedent asked the estate to file a federal estate tax return for the estate and elect portability of the Deceased Spousal Unused Exclusion Amount (DSUE) under the federal gift and estate tax laws. The spouse wanted the benefits from the portability election. The administrator of the estate appealed an order from the trial court, forcing the administrator to do so.
In “In the matter of Estate of Vose,” 390 P.3d 238 (Okla. 2017), reported in Justia, the administrator argued that the district court erred on several grounds. One of the decedent’s children by a prior marriage refused to make the required election for transfer, even though the surviving spouse agreed to pay the cost required to prepare the required federal estate tax return.
Since 2010, a spouse has been permitted to transfer, at death, his or her unused gift and estate tax exemption to the surviving spouse. Prior to that date, each spouse had his or her own gift and estate tax exemption, but any portion of that exemption that remained unused by the spouse at death couldn’t be transferred to the surviving spouse.
The Court saw no merit in the personal representative’s argument that the surviving spouse didn’t have standing. The Court said the right to portability of the DSUE was a beneficial interest in the estate for the surviving spouse, regardless of the surviving spouse’s rights as an heir. As a result, the right to portability was an interest that qualified the surviving spouse to bring the lawsuit.
The estate’s administrator also claimed that the couple’s premarital agreement was a waiver by the surviving spouse of any rights to the estate making a portability election. However, the State Supreme Court said the right to portability became law in 2010, which was years after the premarital agreement was signed in 2006. Although the Court found that the couple did agree to a broad waiver of marital rights under the existing law when the premarital agreement was signed, the agreement didn’t speak to the issue of portability because it wasn’t in the tax code at that point in time.
The Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s decision that the personal representative’s fiduciary obligations to protect estate assets applied and required him to preserve and transfer the decedent’s unused federal estate tax exemption to the surviving spouse.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court rejected these arguments and said that “[a]n administrator of an estate occupies a fiduciary relationship toward all parties having an interest in the estate.”
Accordingly, 26 U.S.C.A. § 2010 requires the administrator to make the election to allow portability of the DSUE, and the only person with an interest in and ability to use the DSUE (if it exists) is the surviving spouse. If the election isn’t made through the timely filing of an estate tax return, it’s lost.
The ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court found that there was no reversible error by the trial judge and affirmed the decision.
Reference: Justia (January 17, 2017) “In the matter of Estate of Vose”